Putting the Plan into Succession Planning

The below article appeared in the March 2012 edition of the Australasian Law Management Journal and can be found on their website here or downloaded in PDF format.

Putting the plan into succession planning

The failure to groom successors in a law firm is a recipe for disaster for both the firm and the founding partner who one day hopes to successfully exit the business, writes John Chisholm.

There is little doubt that succession is one of the most significant issues facing professional firms of all sizes and from all regions in Australia. I suspect this may be the case in the United States and the United Kingdom, too.

Recently I gave a talk entitled Succession Planning: Why Most Firms Should But Don’t outlining some of the reasons that Baby Boomers are still hanging in there and failing to consider the need to plan for the inevitable. These reasons are complex, but often include:

  • Financial position: Anecdotally some partners who might have before the global financial crisis considered retiring ‘shortly’ feel they are no longer in a financial position to do so. Equally, there are other partners who have seen their incomes increase substantially over the last few years, in particular, and even the mere thought of them leaving that income behind gives them the cold sweats.

The Benefits of Fixed Fee Pricing – David Vilenksy

“For most of my professional life I have billed my clients in six-minute units. From the time I started out as a solicitor in the early 1980s, time billing was such an assumed part of the landscape that it barely merited discussion. Expressing reservations about it were regarded, if not as heretical, then certainly as futile.

Time billing was the way it had always been. If the system was to be abandoned, what possible alternative was there?”

David Vilensky discusses his firms transition to fixed fee pricing in his article which was published in the Law Society of Western Australia’s February edition of Brief.

The Benefits of Fixed Fee Pricing

 

Perils the profession can’t ignore – Lawyers Weekly Dec 9, 2011

 In 2012 the Australian legal profession faces a number of key challenges which, if disregarded, pose a significant risk to the performance and sustainability of the industry. Briana Everett looks at the top 10 risks to the future of Australia’s law firms.

center

Mental health

It comes as no surprise that mental illness is one of the biggest threats to Australia’s legal profession.

Over the last few years, countless reports in the media have revealed the devastating e ects ofdepression and anxiety and the high incidence of mental illness in the legal profession, compared to any other.

But despite the increasing willingness amongst members of the industry to speak openly about mental illness, as well as the signifi cant efforts made by organisations such as the Tristan Jepson Memorial Foundation (TJMF) to increase education about mental illness, it remains a huge issue and threat to the legal profession in 2011 and beyond.

In September this year, members of the profession gathered in the Federal Court of Australia to hear a seven-member panel address the ongoing issue of mental illness in the profession as part of the TJMF’s annual lecture. Discussing his own battle with depression, panel member and managing partner of HopgoodGanim, Bruce Humphrys, highlighted the need to address ways of preventing the illness, rather than focusing on alleviating the symptoms.

Law Institute Journal – InPrint – December 2011 issue

centerImplementing Value Pricing

Ronald J Baker, Implementing Value Pricing: A radical business model for professional firms, 2010, Wiley, hb $79.95.

I have read many books on pricing, given my interest in the topic, and this is one of the most comprehensive yet understandable for lawyers.

Ron Baker, founder of The Verasage Institute, a think tank dedicated to teaching value-based pricing to professionals around the world, has written many books on this topic but his latest combines an up-to-date healthy mixture of the theory of value-based pricing and hundreds of practical tips and case studies to enable the theory to be put into practice.

This book is a must read for any lawyer even remotely interested in pricing their services other than by time. Even those who may not see any change happening in the legal profession or are not inclined to move away from time-based billing should read it, if only to be aware of what an increasing number of their competitors are doing.

It is also a book for those who say “value-based pricing is OK in theory but it just won’t/can’t/is too difficult to work in practice”. It is filled with proven, practical examples of how firms can and do price their services other than by time and successfully answer those critics who say it cannot be done.

Lawyers Weekly: Goldilocks solution key to lateral hiring strategy

none

Lawyers Weekly article by Brianna Everett

Goldilocks Solution key to lateral hiring strategy

Posted Nov 23 2011, 12:46 AM by Lawyers Weekly

Law firms with a conservative lateral hiring strategy tend to be more successful than their more active or minimally-active direct competitors, according to new research from the UK. 

As a follow up to research conducted earlier this year into 1,944 partner moves in London across a five-year period, Motive Legal Consulting has conducted new research to determine the extent to which lateral partner hiring delivers value to law firms and the most appropriate strategy to do so.

Recognising that law firm development is affected by a multiplicity of factors, the research report maintains that lateral partner hiring continues to be the “main perceived engine of law firm growth”, with almost every law firm in the UK market having a dedicated strategy to hire partners.

With a serious degree of attrition amongst lateral partner hires in the UK – a rate of 33 per cent after three years and 44 per cent after five years – the research sought to uncover the financial value to firms.

“It stands to reason therefore, that these programmes must be presumed to be having some effect to law firm financials over time. Otherwise, why do it?” said Motive Legal Consulting’s Mark Brandon.